Module 6.7 — Applied capstone: a turbine efficiency/deposition problem traced back to its steam purity root cause using the full Track 6 toolkit.
| PARAMETER | CURRENT | 6 MO. AGO | STATUS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unit Heat Rate | Baseline +1.8% | Baseline | DEGRADED |
| HP Turbine Vibration | Slightly elevated | Normal | TREND |
| Steam Cation Cond. | 0.15 µS/cm | 0.14 µS/cm | OK |
| Steam Sodium | 1.5 ppb | 1.4 ppb | OK |
| Steam Silica | 28 ppb | 9 ppb | RISING |
| Boiler Water Silica | Elevated trend | Normal | RISING |
| Demin Resin Age | Approaching change-out | Mid-life | CHECK |
Click a highlighted row to see how it fits the diagnosis. Steam sodium and cation conductivity are essentially unchanged; steam silica has tripled, tracking boiler water silica and an aging demin resin bed.
Unit 5, a high-pressure drum boiler, has shown a 1.8% heat rate degradation over six months along with a slight increase in HP turbine vibration. A full review of steam purity trending shows cation conductivity and sodium — the general mechanical carryover indicators from Module 6.2 — essentially unchanged from six months ago. Steam silica, by contrast, has roughly tripled, climbing from 9 ppb to 28 ppb, tracking a corresponding rise in boiler water silica. The plant's demineralizer resin bed is noted as approaching scheduled change-out.
The demineralizer resin bed approaching change-out is the strongest lead. Recall from Module 1.3 that demineralization is the makeup water treatment step responsible for silica removal, and from Module 6.3 that a demin system nearing exhaustion can let silica through even while other parameters look acceptable — precisely because silica is often one of the first species to break through as resin capacity declines, before more common ions like sodium show comparable breakthrough. This would explain why sodium and general conductivity remain normal while silica specifically climbs: the demin system isn't failing broadly, it's specifically losing its silica removal margin as the resin approaches end of life.
Applying Module 6.4's location logic: silica-driven deposition is expected in early, high-pressure turbine stages, precisely matching the HP turbine vibration trend noted in this scenario (rather than a low-pressure or wet-stage vibration signature, which would point more toward copper or moisture-concentrated salts). Applying Module 6.5's consequence framework: a hard, glassy silica deposit altering blade aerodynamic profile is a well-matched explanation for measurable heat rate degradation, and if that deposit isn't forming with perfect uniformity across all blades in the affected stages, it's also a plausible driver of the vibration increase.